Framingham Risk Calculator

years
mmHg
mg/dL
mg/dL

A clinical score can look authoritative even when its assumptions are hidden. Framingham Risk Calculator makes the calculation explicit so the number can be interpreted in the right cardiovascular context.

What this calculator does

Framingham Risk Calculator uses Age, Sex, Blood pressure treatment?, Systolic blood pressure, Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and Current smoker? to calculate 10-year Framingham coronary risk. It is built around the exact fields displayed in this plugin rather than a generic version of the topic. Where supported, it also shows Risk score so the primary result is easier to place in context. Cardiovascular formulas are sensitive to measurement technique and clinical context. A mathematically correct output can still be misleading if the input was obtained under a different physiologic condition, with a different assay, or outside the population for which the score was developed.

How to use it

Complete the requested fields, including Age, Sex, Blood pressure treatment?, Systolic blood pressure, Total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol, then finish the remaining items shown in the calculator. Confirm that each yes/no, category, date, or score option is applied exactly as labeled. When the formula combines measurements, use values obtained under the same assessment or physiologic conditions whenever possible.

How the calculation works

This calculator uses the sex-specific Framingham coronary risk regression implemented in the plugin. It combines logarithms of age, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure with blood-pressure treatment and smoking terms, including age interactions in the smoking/cholesterol model. The regression value is converted to a 10-year percentage through the model’s baseline survival.

Example

Using the sample values prefilled in this calculator, the primary result is 5.83 % (10-year Framingham risk) and Risk score is -0.0263. This worked example shows how the plugin’s own default inputs flow through the implemented method; replace them with the correct patient, laboratory, imaging, or personal values before interpreting a result.

How to interpret the result

Read the output as 10-year framingham risk generated by this specific formula or score. The number is most useful when compared with the clinical context and, when appropriate, serial measurements or the current guideline pathway for the condition. A boundary value should not be overinterpreted as a sudden change in physiology.

Limitations and notes

Cardiovascular formulas are sensitive to measurement technique and clinical context. A mathematically correct output can still be misleading if the input was obtained under a different physiologic condition, with a different assay, or outside the population for which the score was developed.

See an error or outdated claim? We welcome correction requests. Request a correctionEditorial policy